And there you go again ignoring my whole point and pulling out from nowhere the statement that 'I know just because i know'. I have already stated my reason numerous times, but you seem to avoid commenting about that. Unfortunally, a debate cant continue if only one side chooses what should be said. It makes it seems like you have pre-made posts on debate about this topic.
What point of your post did I ignore? Your claims that religion is logical when it's not? Nope, I covered that. Your claim that the absence of answers from empirical evidence makes any alternative theory viable? Nope, I covered that too. So tell me, what exactly are you giving as your reason for belief other than irrationality or misapplied logic? And what points in your posts did I miss? It seems to me that you're just making up excuses because you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
NO, you didnt cover my whole point. Let me go back to it, ffs:
- I posted that Religion is necessary to answer that Science cant
- You talk about the Spaguetti Monster
- I answer that Spaguetti or God makes no difference
- You pull out pagan gods
- I stay the same
- You forget about it (?)
EDIT: I like how you begin using bad language to prove your point.